BREXIT and Osborne’s creative accounting

The British Chancellor of the Exchequer, Mr. George Osborne, threatened of an « austerity blow » tax in the case British voters would vote « evil » in the referendum, ie, for the « leave » in the forthcoming BREXIT referendum on the European Union. But George Osborne’s statements do not correspond to the facts and are not substantiated by official EU documents[1]. The « leave » option would not imply any new burden on the British budget. To the very contrary. It should be recalled here that the UK is a net contributor to the EU budget, ie it pays more than it receives. As a matter of fact over the last four years the budget of the EU and UK contribution is the following one:

Table 1

Total contribution in euros billion

2011 2012 2013 2014
Total EU income 130,00 139,54 149,50 143,94
UK contribution 17,42 19,98 21,40 20,14
UK contribution without the “rebate” 13,83 16,18 17,07 14,07
EU subsidies to the UK 6,57 6,93 6,31 6,98
Balance -7,26 -9,24 -10,76 -7,09
Amount of the UK rebate -3,60 -3,80 -4,33 -6,07


Indeed the UK already enjoys preferential treatment, following multiple negotiations which were held with Brussels. Its real contribution is actually less than its theoretical contribution (on VAT, income tax and customs duties). The difference is called the « British rebate » or UK correction within EU accounting documents. But in spite of this correction, the net contribution of the UK varies from 10.76 to 7,09 euros bn per year. The reasoning of Mr. Osborne on an « austerity blow » budget is then unclear. Or may be it is in fact particularly clear an amounting then to pure propaganda. An EU exit would result in a net gain for the UK budget. Similarly, we admit to not understand the reasoning of Mr. David Cameron, the Prime Minister, who claims that a break up with the EU will result in additional difficulties in financing the National Health System (NHS) and the pension system. How a NET gain of money can it jeopardize the functioning of the budget is rather mysterious. Certainly we know that the British are, from a French point of view, weird people who drive on the left, eat the lamb in mint sauce and, occasionally, burn a French shepherdess … But here it is clear that David Cameron demonstrated an astonishing stroke of imagination, or more precisely it seeks to frighten the British inventing imaginary expenses.

The European budget for major EU countries are as follows for 2014.

Table 2

Budget balances for main EU countries

France UK Germany Italy Spain NL
VAT 2,956 2,933 3,699 1,76 1,382 0,819
GDDP 15,014 14,525 21,723 11,435 7,845 5,49
Others* 2,673 -3,3864 1,563 1,967 1,221 0,416
TOTAL 20,643 14,0716 26,985 15,162 10,448 6,725
Subsidies received 13,479 6,984 11,484 10,695 11,538 2,014
Balance -7,164 -7,0876 -15,501 -4,467 1,09 -4,711

*Tariffs and tax on sugar


It is found that in GDP proportion, the Netherlands is making the largest net contribution, which may explain the rise of Eurosceptic sentiment in that country. The net contribution of France appears also significant (about 0.4% of GDP). If Brexit were to triumph, leaving the United Kingdom would result in a financing gap of about 7 billion euros or approximately 6% of total revenue. In this case, we can estimate that major countries should pay more for the budget (for EU reduced to 27 members).

Table 3

Financial Consequences of a BREXIT

TOTAL Total – UK Total to be funded
TOTAL 143,94 129,8684
Subsidies 142,497 135,513
Balance 1,443 -5,6446 7,0876
France Germany Italy Spain NL
Contribution in % of EU-27 budget 15,9% 20,8% 11,7% 8,0% 5,2%
Implied Contribution 1,127 1,473 0,827 0,570 0,367


It is to be noted that this move is largely bearable.

All statements regarding the doomsday budget, whether statements concerning Britain (those of Mr Cameron or Osborne) or other EU countries seem completely unfounded and are of the most utter fantasy. Mr. George Osborne as indulged himself into creative accounting for purely political reasons, a beehaviour which is both a shame and a disgrace

[1] and

Jacques Sapir

Ses travaux de chercheur se sont orientés dans trois dimensions, l’étude de l’économie russe et de la transition, l’analyse des crises financières et des recherches théoriques sur les institutions économiques et les interactions entre les comportements individuels. Il a poursuivi ses recherches à partir de 2000 sur les interactions entre les régimes de change, la structuration des systèmes financiers et les instabilités macroéconomiques. Depuis 2007 il s'est impliqué dans l’analyse de la crise financière actuelle, et en particulier dans la crise de la zone Euro.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *